home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: druid.borland.com!usenet
- From: pete@borland.com (Pete Becker)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Symantec C++ 7.1 or Borland C++ 4.53
- Date: 16 Mar 1996 21:09:22 GMT
- Organization: Borland International
- Message-ID: <4ifam2$rkm@druid.borland.com>
- References: <4c560k$e7d@dyson.brisnet.org.au> <4dht12$lt2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4i8od9$clt@Steinlager.tip.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: pbecker.borland.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
- X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.5
-
- In article <4i8od9$clt@Steinlager.tip.net>, nihtila@nihtila.pp.se says...
- >
- >djmintz@aol.com (DJMintz) wrote:
- >
- >>Definately BC45. There are so many more books and so much more source code
- >>for it, it has th most and the most usefull utilities, the best header
- >>files, it is the best!
- >
- >You say so! Connect to Compuserve and the Symantec support area for
- >Symantec C++ 7.21 and ask those Borland users why they are switching
- >to Symantec :-). Borlands comes with OWL classlibrary, and there are
- >rumours that they are dropping off the support for OWL.
-
- Don't ever base technical decisions on rumors. Especially false ones. We are
- not dropping support for OWL.
-
-